(deleted comment)

Re: hackability of machines

[identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com 2008-10-27 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
We do scribblies here in Alameda County, California, like an SAT test, coloring in a bar across a number.

[identity profile] jajy1979.livejournal.com 2008-10-27 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry but I disagree with the Sci-fi channel. Optical scanners while they report via a network, at least in Alabama, have sealed and secured paper ballot backups which can only be opened by a handful of people, none of which are at the polling stations. Thus if the votes seem erroneous then we can have a recount quickly and easily. The only way to rig our elections is to stuff the box the old fashioned way... vote extra times which can be checked against the voter rolls of those who signed in (required by law here). Also our system is easy to use...it's like taking any scantron test in grade school... mark the line and be done with it.

Frankly I think our system should be adopted nationally...just not our voter ID and residence requirements. (Never mind that the functionally illiterate can't vote with this system. Granted that's a problem across the nation with just about every system.)

Levers I do not think are very secure at all, as evidenced by many Chicago elections of yesteryear.