It's likely I'll get my laptop tonight or tomorrow, which means finally being able to see non-worksafe stuff, not dealing with blocked sites, being able to make use of the ridiculous number of free viewing hours I have on Netflix, catch up on LJ outside of work... Exciting!

I'll be a bit careful about maintaining my healthy isolation in the evenings, though. I'm right on the border between extrovert and introvert, and the intense interactivity of daytime is nicely balanced by the relative isolation of evenings, when I don't have a computer handy. When I do, I tend to spend way too much of it incidentally on IM and LJ, and end up feeling a bit overwhelmed and worn down over time. Anyway, just food for my own thought from a conversation earlier today.

Also, Grafton's here for a bit this week, which is also excellent and cheering.

And I haven't actually had a chance to read it yet, but there's an article on Women's Enews about patient-instructing.

And now it's time to go home. Yay!
So, I finished Smearing the Queer: Medical Bias in the Health Care of Gay Men on my way to B'more. It's excellent, and I highly recommend it, even though it's older than I first thought; published in 1999.

The section that really blew me away was the section about the female condom, the original intents to market it to all genders for both anal and vaginal sex, the benefits it seems to provide for anal sex when used properly, and the underground popularity it has gained in sections of the gay and bi community despite its heavily feminized marketing.

Crap. Meeting-time, gotta run. Maybe I'll finish this up later if there's time. Anyone else know much about this? I'm very curious.

Edit: Here's some more info about it, under the description Bottom condom
Refresher, for those who don't visit, or don't recall my previous pet-related rambles.

current critter list )

Hmmm. That was a bit more extensive than I intended. Anyway, that's the background for what I'd wanted to write about, which is how the pet dynamics work in the household. Many homes have pets, but they're often a somewhat peripheral experience for visitors. With my place, that's the first major thing people notice (they can't help it -- they're usually bombarded with demands for attention from my very not-shy critters). And it's not possible to be the primary caretaker and affection-source for that many animals without it being a major, major part of my life, too. Practical factors for care are much more substantial, even with the extended household (which makes it all so much easier). When I'm not at home I miss them, and when I am at home, there's a real practical consideration to making sure everybody's getting attention and love in some reasonable proportion. None of this is a complaint; just an explanation of why they're a major part of my reality and therefore my conversation, because I'm often reminded that I am, in fact, the crazy cat lady. In fact, I enjoy it immensely, and tend to dognap Jax, Ditko, and Buster on a regular basis as well if Bec, Jer, and Crystal aren't home. (I'm sure it's a shock that St. Francis Day, the Blessing of the Animals, was my absolute favorite religious holiday, and that I intended to be a zoo vet or zookeeper when I was younger).

In general, I think of the critters as something akin to housemates, and this definitely isn't an "off the counters, off the couch" kind of house. In fact, I guess I'd say that my approach to pets is about as hippyish as my approach to households in general. They rarely have to do or not do much that isn't directly related to their health and safety, and it's actually quite uncommon for me to pick up the cats; they either want to be social, or they don't.

Anyway, one of the major results of the number of critters and me being the primary affection-source is that when I'm home I'm usually either covered in or surrounded by them. I love this, but it also means that it can be a bit trickier to get new animals comfortable, and particularly to get them comfortable with me. One of the things I've really noticed is that I don't get far with them while their person is still living here; the entire time Fatty lived here with Musicalchaos he wouldn't even come to my side of the living room, and would only associate with me when I was somehow miraculously temporarily free of the other critters. Same with Cat and Grafton. However, I generally have very good luck once they're on their own, and can finally get them acclimated to the other animals more effectively. Of course, being the source of tasty treats doesn't hurt in the least, either. With both Fatty and Cat (the two shyest new additions) I did a lot of "every time I see you I'll love on you until you decide you're done" stuff. For a while this meant they continued to hang out in their little corners, but they gradually started to come out and come visit more; first when the other critters were mostly elsewhere or asleep, and finally even when the others were around and on top of me (the normal situation). Fatty's come all the way through now, and spends a good chunk of each evening on my lap, and Cat's getting closer and closer, with active encouragement.

(Just wait 'til J goes abroad, and I'm petsitting her three cats, tarantula, turtle, and ferrett for three months!)

Huh. Well, this got all long and rambly and disjointed without actually saying all that much. Oh well. Phones are busy, I'm off to cope.

And now they're quiet for the moment. And I'm too sleepy to focus on anything, so I'm back to rambling. One of the best things about having so many animals in the house is watching them all interact with each other. It's the unending pet soap opera. I'm also highly entertained by how well the cats and dogs generally get along. And I'm constantly amazed and mystified by the very concept that we've created these connections with other species. The ability to connect and develop affection across that barrier never ceases to blow me away, maybe more rather than less as I learn more about the long-term evolutionary process of domestication.
So I finally decide to post something, and LJ goes down? How unfair! OK, back now.

Anyway, quick movie recommendation. For the Bible Tells Me So is really quite well-done, and is tailored specifically for GLBT folks trying to open communication with their (religious) families. It also presents a wide range of christian views on GLBT issues, which could be very helpful for those whose families have only heard the most conservative and negative. It's worth noting that although it mentions bi and trans folk, they're generally not directly addressed in the movie, nor are the particular complexities that they/we present in terms of coming out discussions. Still, it's an engaging piece of work, and I can see definitely helping in its stated goals (in the special features) of helping GLBT folks talk with their friends and families when christian religious issues are a central problem. Additionally, the parents, regardless of where they are in coming to terms with their child's orientation, are presented fairly and compassionately, too.

Be aware that there are a few very disturbing images in the movie of people who've been gaybashed, and one of the daughter of an interviewee, who committed suicide. It's not a large portion of the movie, but they were obviously trying to drive home the point.
Assorted interesting (to me, at least) things I figure might interest others:

Sex Workers' Art Show )

From a mailing list:
The Style section of yesterday's Washington Post features an article on
polyamory.


the documentary Bi the Way is finally complete and going to be shown (see also their blog)

BECAUSE 2008 is coming -- time to register! (this is the Midwest's Bi conference, and I'm thrilled to see if back after a several year hiatus. Anyone else reading this planning on going?)

Tilda Swinton's poly, and dealing with it with exquisite class, as always (like I didn't already have a huge enough crush on her)

Sex Work Conference coming up in Chicago )

Bi Request short film program at San Francisco Int'l LGBT Film Festival )

(which, incidentally, reminds me that The Cleveland International Film Festival is coming up soon!)

And I think that's it for the moment. That turned out to be a lot more than I expected.
From one of my mailing lists
Please X Post


The Rhode Island Health Center Association (RICHA) has received funding to
conduct two trainings to increase the capacity of Rhode Island Community
Health Center providers and nurses to provide appropriate and affirming care
to transgender and gender variant patients.



RICHA is seeking competent trainer(s) to design and deliver trainings to
meet the learning objectives identified below. Learning objectives were
determined by community health center providers based on a comprehensive
needs assessment of the RICHA provider population in 2006. *The appropriate
trainer(s) will approach the care of transgender and gender variant patients
from a patient centered, affirmative, and progressive perspective. *



The trainer(s) must be available to travel to Providence, RI at RICHA's
expense to deliver the training on at least one of the dates associated with
the trainings that they are contracted to deliver (dates listed
below). Training
provider(s) must be willing to allow their training to be videotaped with a
copy provided to each community health center in RI and to be put up on the
website of a local organization for access by RICHA members.
Read more... )

Answers

Feb. 1st, 2008 04:31 pm
1. how would you deal with a young person who is bisexual and is being told its a phase?

Primarily, I'd try to communicate my belief, and the increasing data, that sexuality is a complex, fluid, hard-to-pin-down thing, and that static identity labels have the ability to be as constrictive as they do freeing and self-affirming. Then I'd point out that there's no more or less reason to believe bisexuality will be a phase for them than heterosexuality or homosexuality (people shift in all directions remarkably evenly, actually), and even if any of those were a phase, that doesn't invalidate the importance of such times and experiences. I'd also talk about how identity isn't determined solely by who one is sleeping with, or not sleeping with, at one particular moment. That'd probably lead to a conversation about what issues matter most, regardless of partner choice -- mutual respect, safety, etc -- and I'd acknowledge the presence of biphobia and the issue of bi-invisibility, and talk a bit about how to handle it in our society, and where to find bi/questioning/queer-supportive resources.


2. If you found out one of the people getting an abortion was/is a pro life protester would you out them or how would you deal?

No, I definitely wouldn't. It's not actually a particularly rare occurrence. It frustrates and angers me, but I also think that demonstrating our morals and standards is more important than vengeance, both in the message it sends to that woman, and the message it sends to other patients. I can hope that her experience will change her views, either then or gradually over time, but I can't assume that'll happen. However, it's not like I'm totally high-minded, either. I'm quite sure I wouldn't be able to resist snarking with other people where it wouldn't be a privacy violation (other escorts or employees, for example).


3. What resources and research would you suggest for someone who was interested in creating porn films?

Hmmmm.... Well, keep in mind that I don't follow internet-available porn much at all, so I know nothing about new developments there. I think I'd suggest checking out a wide range of porn (easiest either online, or through a porn rental service; I use sugardvd.com myself, and am reasonably content with it, although I still have to buy my own on too much of the niche stuff they don't have), particularly noting which production companies it's coming from, to start to get a sense of how many ways the topic can be tackled, in everything from actor choice to production values. I'd especially suggest checking out a good deal of the successful indie and queer stuff, but I also think it's valuable to see where the mainstream has attempted to get creative, and in which ways they've succeeded and failed (I think Tristan Taormino's attempts at creating big budget mainstream pieces with her own spin are interesting, for example, and say a lot about where the weaknesses and strengths in that approach turn out to be). I have no idea what AVN (Adult Video News) is like these days -- last time I saw an issue had to be 15 years ago, but it's one place to look and see how the more mainstream stuff is being handled, at least. However, since I doubt you're talking about going to work for Vivid or something, focusing on the smaller productions is likely to be more useful. Looking through Good Vibes and Blowfish's websites can be handy for seeing what kind of creative stuff is being done; they carry and accurately review more of the cool stuff than most places. Blowfish has a Blowfish Presents series, Shar Rednour and Jackie Strano do some fun stuff, Audacia Ray's fun and feminist... There's a lot out there. If you're seriously interested, we should talk at more length some time, by IM or email. I'm not the most knowledgeable, but I'm familiar with enough to point you toward some starting points, at least, if I can understand more what you're thinking about doing.


Since the original question post was on my sexuality filter, I'm screening comments here, too, in case anyone else wanted to ask something (personal, theoretical, TMI, whatever). I'm not sure how many more I'll get through by the end of the day, but I'm having fun so far.
I'm still close to a month behind on LJ, except for sporadic drop-ins to look at a post here or there, but I wanted to note a couple of things before I head out for my doctor's appt (my actual real gyn exam, as opposed to the six I've already taught this week *chuckle* -- I love my doc, so I'm looking forward to chatting with her; I just wish it weren't such a hassle to get to Independence on RTA).

Ohio's Forests are Expanding (link from [livejournal.com profile] bec76)

New Tracey Ullman Show! (link from [livejournal.com profile] bec76)

Study on Bi Women Discredits Stereotypes -- it's only a small study, but it's interesting in its refutation of "it's just a phase", and "bi people can't be monogamous".
I'm exhausted today, and the things I want to write about my trip are too complicated to get into, so I'm just going to talk about one of the movies we watched instead.

I read Mimsy were the Borogoves in high school, and liked it well enough to still recall a good bit of it more than a decade and a half later. So, when I saw ads for The Last Mimzy, I suspected it was based on the story. Given my fondness for children's fantasy movies anyway, I was very interested to see it. Although I definitely have comments and critique, I have to say that I really enjoyed it regardless of any of the following, and do recommend it for kids who enjoy this sort of thing, and to adults who are willing to give the movie some leeway for not being rigorous enough science fiction to stand up to adult scrutiny very well*. Basically, the movie has a bunch of likeable actors playing very likeable characters with some fun special effects, some mild adventure, and some moderately nifty ideas (although not as nifty as those in the original story, sadly). If I needed a three-word review, "fun and pretty" would basically cover it. That said, it's still quite likely I'll buy it sooner or later; I enjoyed it that much, at least.

minor spoilers )

Movies

Dec. 31st, 2007 04:20 pm
Flaring again this weekend, so it was a repeat of last weekend's sleep-a-thon. Did some laundry, watched some movies.

In no particular order:

Aquamarine -- this is a really cute pre-teen mermaid movie. Although I love kids' entertainment, an awful lot of it leaves me yelling at the screen at some point or another, and this one really didn't. It was good for its intended age range, it has morals I actually agree with, and if I'd seen this as a tween myself, I probably would've fallen head over heels for it.

-----------------------

What the hell is wrong with my brain today? Everything I write feels like it's coming out absolutely absurdly stilted and awkward. Bad brain. No cookie. OK, we return you to your irregularly scheduled and absurdly brief movie reviews:
-----------------------

Kim Cattrall: Sexual Intelligence (full disclosure -- I can't stand Sex in the City)

I'm interested in sexuality studies, and I'm especially interested in how they're being presented to the world in general, so I tend to watch a lot of "sex documentaries" on the various channels, usually with unfortunate "throwing things at the TV" results. I've given up on TLC entirely, due to the unsupported gender essentialism that seems ingrained in every single gender and sexuality program they put out. HBO can be decent at times, and some of the talking heads on this program had interesting things to say (they got Betty Dodson, which is always nice, and they had a lot of queer representation, including bi representation, amongst their general interview subjects), but nothing could save it from the soft-focus obnoxiously coy intros and outros with Kim Cattrall. Good grief. Painful. Also, no cookie for inaccurately stating that humans are the only species that orgasm; there's good evidence that counters that. Not recommended.

Dead and Breakfast. The winner of the weekend, hands down. Apparently all I need to be happy in life is some line-dancing zombies and a few expository musical interludes. The second commentary track is hysterical -- makes it very clear just _how_ low-budget this was. I intend to own this movie, oh yes I do. I love it when the zombies have a plan.

All Aboard Rosie's Family Cruise. Does what it says on the tin. It's a mildly heartwarming tale of queer families on a cruise. Nothing special, really, and not something I'd list here except as a chance to bring up something it got me thinking about in terms of identity politics. Those of you who've known me for a while probably already know that I think identity politics have their place, but I'm especially interested in the edges where the boundaries between identity groups fall apart, and I think ultimately we need a "what we have in common is that we're all different" expansionism rather than a "what we have in common is that we're all the same" assimilationist approach (which generally comes along with its own version of the identity police). What got me thinking was the kids on the cruise. Some are simply being raised by GLBT parents, but some are really growing up within the queer community as one of their central subcultures. As yet one more argument against identity policing, does anyone really think these kids, when they grow up, should be even a smidgen less welcome in our community just because they happen to be straight (if they are)?

Phat Girlz -- when I decided to give this a try, I really wasn't expecting it to last (what our household refers to as "the ten-minute test"). I was pleasantly surprised, and although it unfortunately gives Coming to America a run for its money in regards to African realism, the movie in general was cute and amusing. The plot is... basic, to be generous, but it was nice to see the weight issue being handled this way, rather than with the backhanded "compliments" of crap like Shallow Hal (if we were better people, we'd look past all your gross nasty fat, oh yes we would) that's been so popular recently. Then again, the fact that no one in the movie was in a fat suit (don't get me started) gave it a huge leg up there. I wouldn't bother renting it, but if you're bored and it's on TV, it's not bad, although it does at times fall into the unpleasant habit of being nasty about skinniness in ways that suck just as much as similar attitudes about fat.

Reeker -- Merely ok. Interchangeable with any other middling quality late-night gorefest. Mildly interesting twist. Don't go out of your way for it. See also House of 9.

In the amusingly bad category, we've got Spacejacked. Honestly, I don't recall enough of it to say much coherent about it, but I was giggling for most of it, so I guess that's something. Cheesy. Very.

Sweet Charity. Ya know, I'd heard Shirley Maclaine was famous for something other than her past lives... Now I know. It felt a bit jumpy, but it was fun and bouncy and colorful and endearing, and I enjoyed it a good deal.

Citizen Verdict. Oh. My. They make an honest attempt to fit in some interesting and important concepts where they can squeeze them past Jerry Springer's unbelievably bad acting. Extremely uneven, but there are bits of a worthwhile faux documentary in there. I like documentaries and mockumentaries, and I tend to enjoy movies that play with that kind of approach, too, so I was probably easier on this one than most would be. I still don't think most people will be interested in sitting through it, so don't take this as a recommendation.
Brunner: Ohio's vote vulnerable

I can't express how happy I am to have Brunner instead of Blackwell dealing with this, but it doesn't mean I've stopped worrying.

Life good. Work busy. More later.
My previous post triggered my fat rant enough that I figured I'd bring the rest of my book and show notes over here.

I finally got a chance to read Alan Moore's long-awaited Lost Girls while I was in California. I have mixed feelings. Gorgeous art; there are several panels I'd love to have as prints for my walls (especially a few from the opium/island scenes). Incredibly creative reimagining of the stories of Alice, Dorothy, and Wendy, with a lot to say about sexuality's place in our lives and psyches. It was as erotica that it slipped for me. Although Moore makes some very good points throughout about the difference between fantasy and reality, and it's obvious he hit the topics in large part to make those points, it doesn't change the fact that incest and pedophilia are both squicks for me. As a result, it was quite a rollercoaster ride, and not in an entirely pleasant way. As Bec and I were discussing, it was sort of an Oooooh! Ew! Ooooh! Ew! kind of thing. Many parts were powerfully erotic. Many were powerfully squicky, and they were often in such close conjunction it was hard to ride the erotic energy in an enjoyable way, which was incredibly frustrating, because there was so much wonderful, hothothot stuff there. Highly recommended as an incredible artistic accomplishment, but with the caveat that it may be squicky to the point of triggery for some people.

History of the World in Six Glasses was a quick, fun, fascinating look at the place of beer, wine, distilled spirits, tea, coffee, and soft drinks. Actually, it really made me want to reread Tastes of Paradise: A Social History of Spices, Stimulants, and Intoxicants, which my psychopharmacology professor had us read back in college. Anyway, History of the World was fun, but at times more superficial than I'd like. The fact that the section on Coca-Cola talked extensively about how image-conscious Coke was, and how this has had all these positive effects, etc, etc, and yet failed to even mention the historic Coca-Cola boycott relating to South African Apartheid really surprised and disappointed me. There's a lot of fun stuff in the book, and some interesting history, but it felt like the author really lost his objectivity once he got to American soil.

Amazing Screw-On Head was apparently a pilot for the Sci-Fi network. They were absolute morons not to pick it up (given their usual fare, this is sadly unsurprising). Fabulous, twisted, bizarre, hysterical. Rent it. Rent it now. Unfortunately, it's just the one pilot, at 22 minutes, but it's still totally and entirely worth seeing. Oh, yes. Armed monkeys and undead love interests and Abraham Lincoln. [livejournal.com profile] nappalmmk9, I'm especially talking to you, if you haven't seen it yet. I couldn't see the monkey in a scene without thinking of you.

Pushing Daisies may well be my new favorite show of the season. Morbidly Seussian is the best way I can think to describe it. Especially recommended for fans of the late great Wonderfalls and Dead Like Me. Visually fantastic, wonderfully funny.

I'm currently watching one of the old Hartnell Doctor Who eps, and reading The Knights Next Door, which I'm enjoying immensely, but which will likely be its own post once I finish it, since it's gotten me thinking about one of the minor mysteries of my life -- why, despite having so many friends in the SCA since my teens, and despite seeming to be exactly the right demographic, I've never gotten involved -- it's never quite caught me. I think it has a lot to do with where my deepest personal fantasies lie, and where they go in very different directions from those that are shared (or at least somewhat overlapping) for most of the SCAdians and other recreational medievalists I know. That's a whole big post of its own, though, and we're about to head out to Bec's bellydance performance, so it'll have to wait.
I can't express how angry it makes me that I'm paying for these lies. It's a lot of what makes me angriest at the protesters outside the clinics, too. I can understand having differences of opinion on this topic, but if you don't think you can back up your side without lying, what the hell kind of argument do you have?


Federally Funded Lies
Legislation aims to curb deceptive advertising by crisis pregnancy centers

By Martha Calhoon

The stories follow a familiar script: A woman who suspects she might be pregnant visits a local agency that advertises “abortion options,” believing she’ll be counseled on a full range of choices. But this place doesn’t give referrals to abortion providers, or information on contraception, and doesn’t staff medical professionals. Instead, volunteers in lab coats perform an ultrasound on the woman, show her graphic pictures of aborted fetuses, and insist that an abortion would put her at risk of infection and emotional trauma. Finally, she’s handed tiny baby booties and sent home, misinformed and distraught.

There are as many as 4,000 of these so-called crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) throughout the U.S., many of which mask their anti-abortion counseling agenda with advertising that promises legitimate medical care. It is this misleading promotion that Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) has challenged by reintroducing the Stop Deceptive Advertising for Women’s Services Act. The bill, which died in committee after being first proposed by her last year, would require the Federal Trade Commission to enforce truth-in-advertising standards for organizations claiming to offer abortion services.


Sticker Shock
Birth control prices are skyrocketing— and that’s just one way the current federal administration is making it harder for women to obtain contraception

By Allison Stevens

When Emory University incoming senior Nora Kleinman discovered last winter that the cost of NuvaRing, her preferred method of birth control, had nearly doubled at her campus health center— going from $27 to $44 a month—she was forced to make a quick decision: find a way to come up with an extra $204 a year or switch to her parents’ insurance plan, and thus give up the privacy she had enjoyed at the student health clinic. “Everybody’s fairly irritated about it,” says Kleinman. “Myself and so many other women I know were depending on health services at universities for cheap and affordable contraception.”

Millions of women who purchase contraceptives at student and community health clinics across the country have seen prices go from about $10 a month to anywhere between $30 and $50. Such out-of-reach prices are putting intense financial stress on women who can’t afford to pay retail for birth control. And the pressure goes beyond the individual level: Some family planning clinics serving low-income women may be forced to shut down if prices aren’t soon reduced, leaving poor women with even fewer resources to determine the number and spacing of their children.


Hell, I have good insurance and a job that pays well, and I'm concerned about how much the price of my Nuvaring has increased in the past year. Apparently, I pay full price ($44) if I pick them up at the pharmacy, and I pay about $20 each if I order them three at a time from our mail-order pharmacy. Last year I was paying $12 each. I suspect in my case it's related to general shift of healthcare costs from insurance to insuree, but it still sucks. And it totally, stupidly, counterproductive.
The Real Estate of Abortion Politics

The fight over building permits for the Aurora, Ill. Planned Parenthood clinic is just one more example of how the fight over reproductive health is coming down to questions of infrastructure.

Ann Friedman | September 21, 2007 | web only

Dr. LeRoy Carhart may be one of the most prominent abortion providers in the country, thanks to the two Supreme Court cases (Stenberg v. Carhart and Gonzales v. Carhart) that bear his name. But the financial wear-and-tear of fighting dozens of courtroom battles over the past decade is visible in the rundown facade of his women's health clinic in Bellevue, Neb., a small town south of Omaha.

The Abortion and Contraception Clinic of Nebraska, which Carhart runs with his wife, Mary, is housed in building that used to be a marina and boat sales business until the Carharts leased the property in 1993. They gutted it to create their clinic, remodeling the inside to include several small exam and patient education rooms. Inside, two old wood-console TVs blare the Lifetime movie of the week, and the walls are cluttered with framed pictures of horses and lefty bumper stickers. It feels almost homey. "They've been so nice and professional," said one woman, who was at the clinic to have an abortion two days before shipping out to Iraq. "But from the outside it looks like a butcher house."


I think she really hits the nail on the head here in terms of one of the frustrating truths about clinics -- they do often look run-down, and I wish more people understood why. More than that, I wish it weren't that way. She also details all the nasty tactics used to block clinics, close them down, etc.
I'm putting this here mostly for my own reference so I can find it and try some of these at some point. I haven't tried any of them, I'm not specifically endorsing anything, but most of them just seem sensible and worth trying, so I'm not bothering to mark it private, in case anyone else is interested.

practical household hints )
Protesting is good for you, say psychologists
A study by psychologists at the University of Sussex has found that as well as potentially changing the world, participation in protests and demonstrations is actually good for you.
This is one of the findings of a large-scale interview study led by Dr John Drury, Lecturer in Social Psychology, into protest crowds and social movements, often known as 'collective action'.

"Many published activist accounts refer to feelings of encouragement and confidence emerging from experiences of collective action," says Dr Drury. "But it is not always clear how and why such empowerment occurs, so we aimed to explain what factors within a collective action event contribute most to such feelings."

The study involved in-depth interviews with nearly 40 activists from a variety of backgrounds, in which over 160 experiences of collective action were described. The range of events described by interviewees included traditional marches, fox-hunt sabotages, anti-capitalist street parties, environmental direct actions, and industrial mass pickets.


"The main factors contributing to a sense of empowerment were the realization of the collective identity, the sense of movement potential, unity and mutual support within a crowd," says Dr Drury.

"However, what was also interesting was the centrality of emotion in the accounts. Empowering events were almost without exception described as joyous occasions. Participants experienced a deep sense of happiness and even euphoria in being involved in protest events. Simply recounting the events in the interview itself brought a smile to the faces of the interviewees."

Psychologists have become increasingly interested in the role of positive experiences and emotions not just in making people feel good but also in promoting psychological and physical health. Uplifting experiences are associated with a variety of indicators of well-being, such as speed of physiological recovery; ability to cope with physical stressors; and the reduction of pain, anxiety and depression.

"Collective actions, such as protests, strikes, occupations and demonstrations, are less common in the UK than they were perhaps 20 years ago," says Dr Drury. "The take-home message from this research therefore might be that people should get more involved in campaigns, struggles and social movements, not only in the wider interest of social change, but also for their own personal good."


Interesting, and very true to my experiences, but I do have questions about the inherent bias in the sample -- how do these people compare with others? Is this a case where people who are drawn to mass movements do, indeed, get lots out of them personally, but it's not true that you could dump any random person into a compatible protest event and have that effect, or is the effect valid across wider groups? I particularly wonder about introvert/extrovert measures, for example. Do groups of protestors skew toward extrovert?

Anyway, just a quick note about it, because phones are busy, but I wanted to mention it.
I'm absolutely awed by these (link ganked from [livejournal.com profile] yendi)

(oh, and [livejournal.com profile] grf, it was Wim Delvoye's work I was talking about in regards to the stained glass and x-rays)

Profile

moominmuppet

October 2024

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122232425 26
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 12:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios